e-mail me
WelcomeAboutQ and AEditorialsRumorchecksHow to SubscribeHow to ContributeContact UsOur Tag LinePrivacy Policy

 

The City of Richardson and “A Balanced Budget”

There is a great deal of confusion among certain residents over what a “balanced budget” is and whether the City of Richardson should have one. Indeed, the phrase "balanced budget" has become a "red herring", used by some to mislead residents into believing that the City has a finance problem when it doesn't.

To help Richardson residents understand why these concerns are unfounded, how municipal finances are different from for-profit or personal finances, and why certain inflammatory statements about the City's finances are simply not true, this editorial will explore what the phrase "balanced budget" means, whether municipalities in Texas are required to have balanced budgets, and how citizens are to evaluate the financial state of the City.

“Balanced Budget”

Are Municipalities Required to Have a Balanced Budget?

Budget versus CAFR

Conclusion and Postscript

So, what are the take-aways from this new understanding?
  • First, the budget is primarily a one-year, cash-based document, which is understandable by residents who have a solid background in accounting and large company (especially non-profit) finance.
  • Second, the CAFR is a multi-year, accrual-based document that conforms to the very specific and often highly complex rules promulgated by the GASB, so it is written for a small audience of analysts of research firms and buyers of municipal debt. The CAFR will contain many items that will be misunderstood by the casual reader, even if the reader has some background in accounting.
  • Third and therefore, conclusions derived from numbers in the CAFR made by anyone who is not one of those specialists on municipal finance are likely to be misleading if not completely wrong.


Postscript:

For the benefit of the reader who continues to be concerned about some of the allegations they have heard that Richardson runs a deficit every year or that Richardson is propping up its reserves through selling debt, please consider the following:

So we know that the numbers are laid out correctly because of bullet points one and two, and we know that experts believe that the numbers show a successful, well-run City because of bullet point three. The reader should bear this in mind when coming across statements on the Internet that say otherwise.